Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karli, North Dakota


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per WP:SNOW as a hoax. Technically, hoaxes can not be speedied. Bearian (talk) 16:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Karli, North Dakota

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This has absolutely no links on a search engine. Maniamin (talk) 08:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - hoax to me Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  10:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not in the GNIS either. Nyttend (talk) 14:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - A1. If not Strong Delete (hoax, incoherent, drivel). The Rolling Camel (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Hard to believe that something this lame has been up for almost a month. Because of the policy in favor of articles about inhabited places, hoax articles like this are likely to get overlooked.  I'm glad the nominator took the time to ask the question, "is this for real"?   Mandsford (talk) 15:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this is why places shouldn't be inherently notable.  Them From  Space  16:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Real places are inherently notable, but this is a hoax. Edward321 (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - This appears to be a hoax.--Oakshade (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As per all said above.  Staffwaterboy  Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 19:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As stated above, this is definitely a hoax. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 20:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.