Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karlina Leksono Supelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Karlina Leksono Supelli

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails General notability guideline. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. May well be a worthy person but I cannot find any reliable sources inside or outside the article. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep. Google news archive and Google books searching for "Karlina Leksono"  found what look to me like enough sources to pass WP:GNG. There are also some relevant looking hits in Google scholar  including a claim that her arrest at a protest sparked a media furor  and this intriguing excerpt from a book that is unfortunately unavailable for preview (The making of women's activism during the Reformasi years, M Budianta - … in Southeast Asia: Comparing Indonesia and …, 2003): "The expansion of Karlina Leksono-Supeli's career from an apolitical scientist to a committed activist is a good example. Known as a brilliant young scientist, the researcher ..." Here is another book with nontrivial coverage (two long paragraphs) about her. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per the sources, particularly the book, noted by David Eppstein above. Ray  Talk 05:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.