Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karmachakra(Anime)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Karmachakra(Anime)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deprodded without explanation or improvement. Currently, it is wholly uncited, with no indication of notability. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment (Leaning Keep, maybe Draftify): There seems to be legitimate coverage from Indian newspapers such as The Times of India here and Hindustan Times here. A little more niche, but still with editorial oversight: Animation Express.  I could maybe see an WP:NFF argument to draftify (it's always hard to judge production status for animation), but given the nature of this being the first of its kind, I would lean to this being considered notable even if the project failed to release for some reason.  That said, WP:NEXIST is the only rationale I see to keep it... the current state of the article is atrocious, and doesn't provide any actual information.  -2pou (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I could see this as a valid WP:PROMO deletion as well, which I may support, but I've tagged a couple banners on the talk page which were absent before, so maybe someone will see an alert and get a WP:HEY result... Who knows? -2pou (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. 2pou (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. 2pou (talk) 15:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Has WP:SIGCOV, from VICE, India Today and from sources 2pou provided. Coverage is also lasting since the articles are spread out throughout 2020. I've done a bit a work to make it a little less promotional. Jumpytoo Talk 03:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely seems notable, there's sources that come up just from a cursory google search. There's definite room for improvement. Waxworker (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep based on sources found.  D r e a m Focus  19:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.