Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karren Dunkley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Karren Dunkley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Very doubtful notability, resting only on the article in the Gleane; the Time reference merely mentions Philadelphia. Superintendents of schools in large systems are notable, but not usually their assistants. I earlier refrained from speedy deletion to give the article a chance, but the editor has made it into a very highly promotional article for the district.  DGG ( talk ) 17:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * DELETE per DGG. Sounds like a promising young lady that might be notable someday, just not today.  Dennis Brown (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. For a case like this, the appropriate standard is WP:GNG. But we have one independent and nontrivial reliable set of stories about her (the Philly Tribune / Jamaica Gleaner pieces), where I'd prefer to see multiple ones with some chronological spread. The Time Magazine piece also mentions her but only trivially and doesn't really have anything usable about her, and the other pieces I could find in Google news were similar. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.