Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karrigan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Karrigan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

E-sports player. Was speedy deleted as WP:CSD, but is now submitted for discussion to determine notability per Deletion review/Log/2016 July 7. This is a procedural nomination, I am neutral.  Sandstein  06:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as still nothing actually convincing for his own notability. SwisterTwister   talk  21:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep esports, DR.dk, and Daily Dot make 3 independent RS'es, so WP:GNG is met. Jclemens (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm familiar with Karrigan, as he is an old name in the esports scene. However, this article doesn't really clarify why he's notable at this point. Shore this up with better sources, as apparently a Danish source says he has a reputation as a fierce in-game leader. If there can be more than that to prove that he's truly worthy of being included, I'd be open to considering a positive vote. Just, at the moment, this subject matter comes across as rather dubious. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 01:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 'Keep. Consistent high level finishes at top CS:GO events as the team's in game leader means there should be enough coverage to meet WP:BASIC. Will work on this after I get back from weekend travel. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in DR.dk, Sport1, L33t Magazine, Aftonbladet, and Daily Dot is plenty for WP:GNG.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Prisencolin; meets WP:GNG with a multitude of reliable, independent and in-depth coverage. -  Yellow Dingo &#160; (talk)  10:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.