Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karrin Rachelle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | babble _ 20:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Karrin Rachelle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * WP:Vanity  (Possible COI with IP Editor)
 * WP:GNG - Fails - Google produces Web 2.0 Fluff
 * PeterWesco (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree; fails WP:GNG to produce any hits other than promo/fluff/blogspots/personal .com sites/etc. Seriously runs into WP:BLOG, WP:QS and others too lazy to list. A desire for publicity/promotion is one thing, but using Wikipedia for it is the wrong venue.Яεñ99 (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable, fails WP:GNG among others and like the nominator stated, the article reeks of being a vanity page and there is not enough enclycopedic content based on reliable sources to save the article. Holyfield1998 (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.