Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karshanam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Karshanam

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFILM. Not a single review from a notable critic. No coverage.  scope_creep Talk  14:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. I searched for the Kannada name ಕರ್ಷಣಂ and added these three references:  I wish we could get participation from editors who read Kannada. I can't, so I am limited to what understanding I can get using Google Translate. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * That first one has malware on the url. These three reference copies of IMDB. The third one is a review about 12 lines, compressed into English. They are click sites and they are really and low-quality references. Very poor.   scope_creep Talk  00:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails GNG/NFILM. Nothing notable on my search. Kolma8 (talk) 02:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The Asianet source is a full review by Kannada Prabha newspaper. If one more review of good quality is found, the article can be kept. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Hello sir. Here is one more review in Prajavani . It is a big newspaper in Kannada. And, more news about film when it go to dubbing etc, . I remember even seeing more reviews in newspapers when it was released but don't know where to find them. It was a very popular movie. That's why so much news on it. Ntkn769 (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC) — Ntkn769 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete: Fails WP:NFILM and there is no significant coverage in reliable sources and current sources are mere announcements. I'm a little concerned about the reliability of this paper cutting, it was published under their "Common Supplement Edition", but looking at their website there is no such category and can't find anything in the archive. Also, this is just a regular news piece (not a review) and there is no evidence it was published in Prajavani. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 15:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and GSS.4meter4 (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.