Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik Naralasetty (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The discussion here is split between deletion and merging, and ultimately there's no consensus after two relistings. A merge discussion can continue on an article talk page if desired. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 04:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Karthik Naralasetty
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously AfDed. Does not meet WP:BIO; the referenced award does not have any apparent notability itself. ToBk (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete: I can find a couple of sources: this from The Hindu in 2010 (which appears to have been considered in the previous AfD) and this PC Mag report in 2011, but neither these nor his place as one of several winners of an award provides evidence of encyclopaedic notability; the previous AfD decision should stand. AllyD (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge the basic information to socialblood, as so far he's just another small-time internet entrepreneur, and get rid of the rest. And then we can have a separate debate about socialblood... RomanSpa (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to socialblood for now as per User: RomanSpa.-- Pink Bull  19:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.