Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartiki Gonsalves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  JGHowes   talk  01:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Kartiki Gonsalves

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO. Coverage in independent sources is sparse, with the most significant coverage being this softball interview. I wasn't able to find more independent coverage online. Awards won are non-notable brand ambassadorships that don't meet WP:ANYBIO. This article has been draftified twice, by and, and both times the initial editor,  moved it back to mainspace without significant edits or further comments. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - I draftified it in the hopes that it might be worked on and developed to show notability. But I can't find how they pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 23:55, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:NBIO. Violation of AfC process by draft/article creator. --Gpkp [ u • t • c ] 08:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:GNG, as well as WP:NBIO. Just another camera(wo)man with job. Having a job doesnt make you notable for wikipedia. Giving a lecture once in while at well known institutes doesnt make the person notable either. Subject doesnt have significant coverage in reliable sources. Also, there were like 3-4 hits for reliable sources, but it was because the subject was credited as "photographer". No in-depth coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Also, violation of AfC process. She looks kind of beautiful though. — usernamekiran (talk)   20:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, Being a camerawoman does not make anybody notable, fails WP:GNG,  Alex-h (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The article from the Economic Times is valid, But only one reliable source with in depth coverage is not enough to meet our general notability guidelines or justify inclusion. Articles written by the subject herself or non RS sources do not count. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.