Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karunasena Hettiarachchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Karunasena Hettiarachchi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only coverage that seems to be available is trivial mention in press releases, routine announcements, photo ops, and primary sources. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources seem to be available, and these are required for WP:BLP. Fails ANYBIO, BASIC, and GNG. Wikpedia is not a platform for promotion and is not a directory. Additional criteria says that holding office is not a guarantee of notability per NPOL. The lack of available reliable sources strongly indicates this subject does not meet BLP standards requiring high quality sources ---Steve Quinn (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete the subject is clearly not notable - no sources available that establish any indication of notability. Dan arndt (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * a simple [|Google Serach] turns out 800 results -- Eng. M.Bandara -Talk  02:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment none of which is significant coverage, just trivial mentions in passing. Fails WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 02:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I have tried to find sources to expand the article, but there is nothing beyond the subject's appointment to the post and subsequent trivial mentions in relation to the role. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 03:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:36, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.