Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaser Mehmood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Kaser Mehmood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reasonably disguised promotional article. I think every source is either unreliable or otherwise just has a passing mention of the subject. Seems to be a lot of web hits on the subject, but again I think it's all promotional. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   16:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Does not seem to have acheived much of note. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment - While this page has all the hallmarks of one of those promotional articles that PR companies write for paying non-notable clients, this picture (subject shaking hands with Bill Clinton) prevents me from simply voting delete on grounds of notability :-) I'll try to look into it some more. ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I still say delete. NN as yet.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete It has come to my attention that the article creator is here simply as a paid editor to create promotional articles for non-notable subjects. This subject of this article fails the GNG. Ridernyc (talk) 09:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant notability; while the subject has apparently been involved with a number of notable people and places, notability is not thereby gained. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:57, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * DeleteNo significant covrage, fails notability.TheLongTone (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.