Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashif Ibadullah Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Kashif Ibadullah Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure if this can be better improved as the best I found was this and this and this simply has not changed since starting in November 2005. Pinging taggers and. SwisterTwister  talk  07:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: There is so little (almost nothing) here; notability is not established... I can't find this Protea publisher from the mass of odd bookshops etc with that name; the book gets an Amazon rank of 8,165,975(!) in Books. Publishing on that level is simply not notable. Imaginatorium (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: nothing of value in the current article, and evidently hard to come up with anything else. Ijon (talk) 01:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Insufficient evidence of notability.   Montanabw (talk)  03:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.