Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasia Boddy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Kasia Boddy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage per WP:PROF. SL93 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 02:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 02:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * keep she has multiple reviews of her books (Boxing, Geranium) in academic journals, that is sufficient for both WP:NAUTHOR (and also WP:NPROF). --hroest 03:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per hroest and WP:NAUTHOR. pburka (talk) 03:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added to the article many reviews of her books in a mix of academic journals and major newspapers, which give her an easy pass of WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Consider this withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.