Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaskad (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete both per lack of WP:V and WP:RS. Subject to re-creation when evidence proves they even exist. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Kaskad, SVR "Zaslon"
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced/ nonverifiable texts about supposed highly secretive (yeah, sure) Russian spec ops by alleged former kgbist, see also Articles for deletion/Strelok `'Míkka>t 17:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete both unless reliable sources can be found. //   Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 17:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both Unsourced and non very notable.  Reywas92 Talk  20:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep both. I have included a couple of sources in "Zaslon". These units do exist and notable. These articles should be improved rather than deleted.Biophys (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Your references provide zero information. `'Míkka>t 03:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Kaskad. It is unreferenced, without demonstrated notability, and consists of a combination of two feuding mini-articles. Weak Keep SVR "Zaslon", which does at least have a couple of refs, both from the "Institute for the Study of Conflict, Ideology, and Policy", for what that's worth, and some modest notability. Tim Ross ·talk  16:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Kaskad. Fails WP:A on a base level. Cloudz679 (talk) 14:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both - without prejudice. At this point, fails WP:V and WP:RS in a major way. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  14:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.