Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kassall Greene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Kassall Greene

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Bilorv ( talk ) 22:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Caribbean. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep User has nominated ~25 articles for deletion in ~20 minutes. Imposisble that a WP:BEFORE was done for each, and the nominations appear to be in bad faith. NemesisAT (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Each nomination needs to be judged on its own. While at times a large number of nominations made at once may make doing so hard to do, the solution to such a problem is not to made a fast decision, but to keep the nomination open long enough for people to find useable reliable sources to boost the article. I am going to go look and see if I can find some.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Well I did find this photo with him named in the caption . This is not enough to justify keeping the article, but I think we need to do more searching. Ideally for current people one would do a google news search before nominating the article, and if one found something one would at least say "I found a captioned photo, but that is not enough to add towards GNG." I understand that a good encyclopedia is not found with a huge number of small articles lacking good sourcing and good substantial statements, but we are not going to get to a good article by deleting alone. Low inclusion criteria does not just lead to us having lots of articles on people who are not notable, it leads to use having articles on people who are notable that either do not mention all the things they did to show notability or do not come close to using all needed sources. Basically some article creators create a bare minimum article, and then hope others will come improve it, but when they have flooded the project with lots of new content no one ever really comes along to do either, even after a decade. It does not do us good to delete articles that will just be recreated in a few months when people bother to check in depth for sources, so I think we need to make sure to let this nomination run its course until we are sure we have ruled out there being any reliable sources that are in-depth and give significant coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per NemesisAT. In addition, he is a young international capped player with an ongoing career. I look at the other sports WikiProjects and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Fails GNG and WP:NSPORTS with no significant coverage to "qualify for an article". This is a classic NOTSTATS. It is less than a resume and even falls short of being considered a pseudo biography so I guess we can call it a glorified dictionary entry. -- Otr500 (talk) 12:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:GNG, and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. The !votes for keep are meaningless; one is procedural (WP:NOTBURO), and the other appears to be based on the same procedural concerns as well as a now-removed guideline (international capped player). BilledMammal (talk) 14:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.