Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kassie Lyn Logsdon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Kassie Lyn Logsdon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable. Off2riorob (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wasn't it recently decided that 'Playmate of the Month' was no longer sufficiently notable?  David V Houston (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment When putting an article up for deletion, you need to state why you are putting it up for deletion more then "not notable." Why is this person not notable? Just saying not notable is not giving the people information they need in discussing a biography related AfD.  Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Notability (people).Off2riorob (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: I understand that WP:PORNBIO was changed recently via Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2010 but I don't think that outcome necessarily reflected true consensus.  The bright line rule of "every playmate gets an article" was much easier to administer and reduced editor overhead time, instead of us spending lots of time deciding that some (most?) playmates get articles and a few get shuffled off into some "playmates of 200x" article.  I guess we'll see, if these articles get deleted, whether they get successively recreated. (Note I have posted this same comments on other playmate AfDs which were nominated at about the same time, i guess)--Milowent (talk) 04:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Keep, its newsworthy, especially when you see them move onto more successful things see - Kelly Werstler, Pamela Anderson, Shannon Tweed, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonynose (talk • contribs) 22:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep   By longstanding general consensus despite a rather obscure attempt to overthrow it in a local decision, which the community is clearly rejecting.  DGG ( talk ) 08:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * delete or merge to list article. Does not evidence notability as defined by substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources unrelated to the subject. Hipocrite (talk) 15:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 10:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above. No evidence of passing notability criteria in WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. EuroPride (talk) 11:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ENT, no indication the subject can yet satisfy the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.