Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaszëbskô Jednota


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 21:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Kaszëbskô Jednota

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The page does not cotain much neutral content. It has positive and unsourced content which is probably original research or direct translation from some promotional material. Most sources are not neutral while looking at their titles alone. The claims are not supported by any English sources, only by Polish ones, though it isn't so important. What is important, though, that it does not really abide by WP:ORGCRIT. Also, I'll ignore the first 3 references, as they are primary sources. The first reference is a passing mention of a quote by the former leader of the organisation. The second one is acceptable, though it calls the organisation "Kashubs". The third is similar. The fourth cotains a quote of an organisation member. The fifth mentions two organisations on the same level in a video interview. The sixth reference includes a quote and some other stuff from the organisation, which is considered mentions. The seventh reference basically says that the organisation is fighting for Kashubians' independence. So, I wouldn't say these were the best sources. Alongside that, it has many other issues listed on the top of the article. MatEditzWiki (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MatEditzWiki (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. MatEditzWiki (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep While the article is not very good, I do believe it passes WP:GNG. Did you do a WP:BEFORE search before nominating, MatEditzWiki? A quick google search brings up in depth, independent sources such as https://wejherowo.naszemiasto.pl/byly-burmistrz-hollywood-dolaczyl-do-kaszebsko-jednota/ar/c1-8352468 https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=45234 https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/110479/edition/95798/content http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-660d14ba-8cb9-42f3-a5a1-bc0ede057b62 and that's only several of the results,. If the poor state of the article was your main reason for nominating for deletion, please again refer to WP:BEFORE. Pladica (talk) 05:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Hmm. I didn't see those sources when I googled it. All I saw was mainly primary ones. I'll do deeper research next time, thank you. MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It this case please withdraw the nomination, otherwise the discussion may be prolonged, due to low participation. Lembit Staan (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is verifiable. Lembit Staan (talk) 17:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is of course verifiable. --Arorae (talk) 23:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.