Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katapult (roller coaster)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:44, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Katapult (roller coaster)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the WP:GNG litmus test with very little coverage in one known reliable source (RCDB.com), hardly more than a passing mention. It does not require a standalone article, and the only content here so far is non-notable ride specifications and some comments that are clearly original research. GoneIn60 (talk) 18:51, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete There's nothing meaningful in the article to establish notability and I couldn't find anything reliable and verifiable in a Google search to support a claim. Alansohn (talk) 14:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.