Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katatonia/Primordial Split 10"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Catchpole 20:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Katatonia/Primordial Split 10"
Totally not notable. 14 hits on google, one message board, some ebay stuff, and that's about it. Looks like total fluff. Kmaguir1 07:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Both of the bands that contributed to the EP have articles on them and appear vaguely notable - multiple albums out, active for long periods of time, some claims to originality/notability. There seems to be a general policy that if a band is notable, their records are too.  I suppose they are easy to maintain as articles, anyways - once you have a track listing and an album cover, you're done, forever, unless someone wants to add reissues. --Brianyoumans 05:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Brian. Perfectly fine stub. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Wow, more annoyingly anal users trying to get articles deleted that they don't like. The article in question right now is called a stub and I created it.  I suppose it'd be more logical to put a "stub" notice at the bottom rather than whine about deleting it all together.  I've contributed numerous other "abbreviated" album pages to Wikipedia for Beyond Dawn and other groups and have never faced such a rediculous proposition before.  I guess that's what I get for trying to contribute obscure material to Wikipedia - people like Kmaguirl who want it gone simply because it's "totally not notable".  Feel free to respond to this post with whatever self-serving means necessary, because I won't be back to respond.  I've said my piece and you can delete that album if it bothers you that much.  --Filter1987
 * Strong keep. Two notable bands and a good stub. The fact that it's a split album doesn't make it less notable. Prolog 19:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.