Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Bracks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Kate Bracks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO basics, mostly a WP:BIO1E person only known for being a winner of a reality show, which generally fails GNG guidelines. Suggest redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 3) instead. SanAnMan (talk) 18:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 18:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 19:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ANYBIO #1 as a national Masterchef winner. Also passes WP:GNG as already demonstrated in the article. StAnselm (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Winning a reality show is far from "a well-known and significant award or honor". - SanAnMan (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Food and drink, Television,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep . One a group of Mass nominations largly based on a false premise, the claim of one event. egs Jackson was known for two series, 2014 and 2020. McKay is curently getting attention for the current season as well as the one she won. Cheliah also was in the current season. Chan is also a TV host with two seasons of a show titled with her name. Lazy nominations lacking any real before. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As a general principle, I agree with the keep voters, but Bracks doesn't seem to have done anything significant since winning the show. That seems to be a relatively rare case amongst MasterChef winners, who've usually gone on to stay in a public role in some context, but that others did doesn't render Bracks notable beyond the 2011 series. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Also released a book. Sydney Morning Herald (mixed use as it's largely interview). Rise (article) Australian Women Online (don't know about reliability). (short review).  (short review).  (review).  (review with sample recipe).  (review). duffbeerforme (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to meet WP:GNG, if not quite WP:NAUTHOR given Duffbeerforme's comments. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Made weaker as most sources cluster around 2012/13. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Publishing one cookbook does not seem to meet the standards of WP:NAUTHOR either. - SanAnMan (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment It's not the publishing of the book, it's the having independant reviews of the book. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. The cookbook deal comes with winning the show (and is inevitably going to be reviewed given the attention of winning the show), so arguments based on the prize cookbook essentially amount to arguing inherent notability for Masterchef winners regardless of post-show sourcing. All of the sources cited here also come from 2013 and essentially relate just to the reality show win - there's no lingering notability. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. There is loads of Australian news about her launching her book, Indian news about her snubbing the Dalai Lama, she won a television cooking competition that is notable, so that's three events, and multiple news about each of them. CT55555 (talk) 03:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per duffbeerforme and CT5555. Easily enough to meet WP:BIO. Deus et lex (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.