Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Butler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Kate Butler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable actress. Her roles are minor and she is not receiving outside coverage of note. only (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find anything significant and reliable outside of IMDb. I don't mind an external link to IMDb because it's a useful resource.  But it's a database; it's in the name.  Database entries don't imply any notability whatsoever, you practically just have to exist and be an actor to have an IMDb page.  So when an external link to IMDb is all an article cites, and I can't find sources that show the subject is notable, I'm going to vote delete.  Someone really needs to write an essay on this...   SITH   (talk)   18:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 20:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability guidelines - no reliable sources, and I can't find any significant coverage of her. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Article lists no reliable coverage and my own search didn't find anything significant, although searching is difficult because her name is not unusual. There is no indication that she meets any of the notability criteria for WP:NACTOR. Papaursa (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.