Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Crash (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted G11 and A7. Peridon (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Kate Crash
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and associated sub articles. red dog six (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. I could not find any substantive coverage about her. The article links to a mention in LA Weekly, which is minimal. I could not find anything at all at Google News. --MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find sources covering her substantially (or at all). Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't pass our music guidelines... or any other guidelines either. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is a pretty blatant spam article for her. I've tagged it as a speedy for its promotional tone. I just can't find anything to show that she's notable. I'd probably recommend that this maybe get salted, considering that this was deleted previously and re-added, as well as because someone has also tried to add some of Crash's work to Wikipedia. This suggests that someone will inevitably try to re-add this again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.