Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Edmondson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 05:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Kate Edmondson
Kate Edmondson currently doesn't deserve an entry. All she has done is presented two releatively minor shows. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uranusx2006 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 3 September, 2006 (UTC).


 * Keep - MTV VJ, notable for the same reasons that Kayleigh Pearson and Tanya Robinson are: won a talent competition in a national magazine, only doubly notable for her role on MTV UK channels. Driller thriller 18:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * She is certianly more notable than some of the people here on Wikipedia. Take Bob Johnson (radio) for example. All he has done is produce a relatively minor radio show, and once filled in for a presenter when he was ill. Yet apparently he is 'really notable' even though he only produces a radio show heard by 500,000 people a night. TMF meanwhile broadcasts to an audience of a million people a day, and she is pretty much on it daily. So Keep IMO. Anon Dude 18:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - She's an up-and-coming star plus I will keep it updated. Jemthepen 12:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - TMF is a free to air station in the UK, and therefore has potentially one of, if not the, largest audience for a music channel in the country. TMF Live, which Kate presents is also a core part of the channel's schedule being both daily, and the only live output produced by TMF UK. I would therefore dispute these are minor shows. Kate is also one of very few on-screen VJs/Presenters employed by the channel, therefore doubly notable. This entry should be retained. Ericmote 14:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Kate has only 367 google results including namesakes, another reason why it must go. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uranusx2006 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 10 September, 2006 (UTC).
 * Comment - I get 901 Google hits searching for her... Driller thriller 14:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose As she was featured in a popular culture publication & is a presenter/VJ on the UK's most watched music channel. Alexj2002 14:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - The listing of this article at AfD was never properly completed, I've gone ahead and done that now. This has been dragging along for ages now. Driller thriller 14:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep MTV is a popular network and there presenters will be known to most people who watch it. Seano1 22:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above comments.  Yamaguchi先生 23:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.