Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Kelly (feminist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Kate Kelly (feminist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG and WP:BIO Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Tkfy7cf (talk) 05:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep&mdash;Wide range of WP:RS cited in the article are more than sufficient to establish notability. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'd like to hear more of the nominator's explanation as to why the article fails WP:GNG. As far as I can see, there is more than enough coverage in independent, reliable sources. Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It is ridiculous to suggest that this page should be deleted, as demonstrated by the excellent sources. Sanpitch (talk) 15:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm not seeing where this fails GNG/Notability. Several sources (including The Salt Lake Tribune and New York Times) about the article's subject seem to validate notability.Stesmo (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources seem more than adequate. Per Good Olfactory, if we knew exactly why this was nominated, we could address specific concerns. Grayfell (talk) 22:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.