Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Murphy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy-deleted as CSD G10 negative unsourced BLP, and as CSD G3 blatant hoax by User:Jclemens. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 16:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Kate Murphy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I came across this article because I had deleted another article by the same editor, one that was an obvious hoax. For this one, I have not been able to find any sources that verify the information in the article. The ESPN website does not corroborate the information; see this search for example. I suggest deletion due to failure of WP:V—but am bringing this to AfD to ask other editors to try to find sources, in case any do exist. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. It's a hoax. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I G3-tagged the other article that Mr. Erik refers to, and its text was nearly identical to this article's. This is clearly a hoax. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 04:21, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete clearly a hoax that suckered me in... ukexpat (talk) 01:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.