Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Steavenson-Payne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Kate Steavenson-Payne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress. Ridernyc (talk) 18:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to meet NACTOR requirements, and the cursory cookie-cutter nomination provides no basis for concluding otherwise. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * because there is nothing more to say minor roles, no coverage. Your cookie cutter keep offer no real reason to keep.  Ridernyc (talk) 21:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Checking again there is literally zero coverage I can find on this person besides IMDB. Ridernyc (talk) 21:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete although I found a mention here, mention here in this book, and a mention here. Her face is here, and the picture emerging is a competent character actor who is in film and who has a name in a technical sense, but doesn't get much attention from the public regarding her off-screen persona, hence not much press, which is heartily unfair perhaps to the hard-working character actors, but such is life. I don't see the sources I found as meeting the WP:GNG but I can change my mind if more sources are found or new arguments presented.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   20:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Only "reference" is to IMDB which is not reliable. Not verified, therefore notability cannot be established despite the claims in the text. Hasteur (talk) 20:39, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR. No sources are cites thus also failing WP:V. A Google yielded nothing that rings the notability bell. In fact it failed to turn up the WP:RUNOFTHEMILL coverage one would expect for even minor non-notable actors. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.