Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate battle

Kate battle was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Looks like a vanity page. They aren't notable enough a person to have an article really - only 27 Google hits. Estel 20:59, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Gamaliel 21:12, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Vote to be kept. Is a valid journalist according to Google.com search. Might add that this writer does a lot of music reviews. Could be helpful to someone searching for info about the writer if they read her/his articles. {unsigned vote from 208.60.212.139, author of the article}
 * Could also be deleted. [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 21:37, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Nonnotable newspaper. Delete. Reference link to one of her articles [[User:BrokenSegue|BrokenSegue]] 23:43, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: The newspaper isn't so non-notable, and it sounds like she is on her way to good achievements, but she is not a presence outside of her local community and therefore is not really suitable for an encyclopedia entry. Geogre 02:41, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity page. The newspaper might be worth an article, but that does not mean their individual journalists are. - Andre Engels 13:37, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable vanity page. Mattley 23:53, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.