Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate croley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 23:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Kate croley

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very weak claim to notability with hardly any hits on Google Search and none on Google News. Favonian (talk) 10:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination and per WP:BIO--Komrade Kiev (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * speedy delete for no content. So tagged.  Only cite to notability is an add for a snack food? Nowhere near notable, I hate to say. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 02:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A1 - Article lacks sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Without more information about Ms Croley or the ad she appears in it would not be possible for other editors to meaningfully expand or verify this article (even on a Google search for Kate Croley you wouldn't be able to tell if it was the same woman as this article).  I'd note she also fails the (much higher) standards of WP:ENT and WP:N.  The A3 speedy delete by Dennis the Tiger above, though, is not appropriate, as the article does contain content, just not useful content. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.