Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katelyn Clampett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. and salting  MBisanz  talk 05:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Katelyn Clampett
cat=M Katelyn Clampett was a contestant on American Idol Season 9. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.47.77 (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy deleted multiple times, last speedy contested. Contains claims of notability that disqualify for speedy. Claims are only supported in Myspace page. Without reliable sources, it should be deleted (and probably salted). -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable singer. No valid references to support claims.  Cannot find any references to "From Fairways to Airways" to support claim listed in article.  "Performer/Songwriter Contest" was from Berklee College of Music - local contest. No hits in Google associating her with a "Songwriter Contest" award.  Any potential Notability is based on future events that will probably not meet requirements. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete and Salt. This has been deleted three times in one day and is back for a fourth go with nothing new to redeem it. It is promotional and clearly does not meet the inclusion criteria. The subject is an aspiring musician about to release her first record on the internet. While she may have recorded songs for social networking sites, to call this a "discography" is a real stretch. She has a very long way to go before she gets within sight of encyclopaedic notability. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Non noteable and unreferenced 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 16:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —DanielRigal (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as notability is not established by independent sources. Boston (talk) 20:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete but Don't Salt Not-notable, obviously, but in theory she could be someday, and at that time salting may prevent someone from writing an article. (Full disclosure:  I subscribe to a salt-as-last-resort ideology) 7triton7 (talk) 06:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I see what you are getting at, but we have to do something to prevent further recreation. Is there a way to do a timed Salt on it where recreation is blocked for, say, 1 or 2 months? --DanielRigal (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, unless a credible reference can be found, it should be deleted. I would suggest a time limited salt.Smallman12q (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt If/when she actually becomes notable, the article can then be de-salted. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 05:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Continual recreation is unacceptable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 05:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.