Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katelyn Polantz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Spartaz Humbug! 08:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Katelyn Polantz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Draft already exists at Draft:Katelyn Polantz which is why I am coming here. Draft was declined by User:Umakant Bhalerao initially. My own take is that current sources don't satisfy WP:SIGCOV, an article in NYTimes about her wedding doesn't seem right for an article that is talking about her as a journalist. Sources do not look WP:INDEPENDENT to me. Needs more citations. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United States of America. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Pennsylvania.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The information is drawn from several staff bios from publications Polantz has been involved with as well as the Politico Q&A and the NYT wedding piece (which I hold is valuable info for the personal life heading, as well as date of birth). The independence of the sources could certainly improve — does anyone have any sources with which Polantz is less personally involved? Thank you for the input 2600:1016:B077:6071:D945:4F5A:2CD3:167A (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  13:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of SIGCOV of her as a journalist. A wedding announcement doesn't contribute towards notability. The Pittsburgh Post Gazette article is not independent because it's an interview. Also does not meet NJOURNALIST. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Her work and coverage and has been cited in several books and journals –– I feel referencing these could bolster the credibility of the article. Would these fit under the "Reporting" section or warrant their own section? Patrickswain (talk) 17:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Being cited in a book/journal does not establish notability. There needs to be significant coverage of Polantz as a person, not just of her work, to establish notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: Does being interviewed by your employer count towards notability?, . I wouldn't count the wedding article as SIGCOV, it could be used to flesh out an existing article, but can't be used to keep an article. Oaktree b (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Coverage is mostly found related to the Mueller Report, I think she was a reporter on that item at the time. Oaktree b (talk) 13:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Being interviewed by your employer does not establish notability because that interview is definitely not independent. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. This person is an average, mid-career reporter. The main claim to notability in the lede seems to be she was EIC of her school newspaper. 128.252.210.3 (talk) 18:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.