Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Brucker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Katherine Brucker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability  DGG ( talk ) 10:13, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete ambassadors are not default notable, acting heads of diplomatic missions during changes in official head even less so.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete ambassadors are not inherently notable, and as John Pack Lambert points out acting heads of missions even less so. LibStar (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Lefcentreright  Talk  (plz ping) 16:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete we've had US Ambassadors randomly kept before on marginal sourcing, but there's not enough there to keep. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia does not extend any "inherent" notability freebie to all ambassadors just because they exist — an ambassador's includability depends entirely on whether she can be shown to clear WP:GNG on the sourcing or not. But a "staff" profile on the self-published website of her own employer is never a notability-making source for anybody in and of itself, and the only other source shown here is a 116-word blurb in a directory of diplomats, which is not a notability-boosting source either. We require journalism about her and her work, not just technical verification that she exists, to make her notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.