Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Curtis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Katherine Curtis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources to verify notability independent from Naked News. Information about subject can be mentioned in main Naked News article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Then why not be bold and merge or redirect yourself? - Mgm|(talk) 00:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * A previous prod ended up in a delete but the article was restored because another user contested the deletion. I'd prefer a discussion before trying to wipe out any content and replace it with a redirect rather than unilateral boldness. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that the individual pages of all the anchors should be merged into the Naked news page, or that the sources for Katherine's Page aren't reliable enough to be used here at all? (there are two ways to interpret your comment) --Threkk (talk) 20:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The latter. Some of the anchors, like Lily Kwan for example, may be notable enough for their own entry. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I would agree that Lily is notable, and that not all the anchors are. I feel that Lily is notable because she's done more at the Naked News than just read the news(Interviews, Concerts, Gallery Openings, etc and Producing her own segment). Similarly Katherine Curtis has done more than most of the anchors (she's taken over most of the interviews that Lily used to do for one thing, and she created a new segment she's writing), which is especially impressive to me because she's been with the show for only a year now. Most of the anchors I would consider deserving their own entry didn't do as much as Katherine in their first year (Samantha Page did some interesting stuff pretty quickly though) --Threkk (talk) 22:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, Assuming the external references aren't a spoof, then this article is about a person apparently notable enough for an article. -- SGBailey (talk) 22:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. Vidor (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.