Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine E. Scharhon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. The raw vote total is 6-3 Delete. One of the Keeps is Weak. So the numbers say Delete. As to arguments, not meeting WP:BIO is a strong argument if true. My analysis is that it is true. WP:BIO asks for actors to have appeared in "well-known films" and so forth. Regardless of its artistic merit, Brand Upon The Brain! is an indepentt 90-minute black-and-white silent that has, at least not yet, attained the status of "well-known" as far as I can determine. I'm not seeing a counter-argument to overcome the failure to meet WP:BIO. So with both numbers and argument favoring Delete, I so close. Herostratus 09:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Katherine E. Scharhon
Non-notable person; doesn't come close to meeting WP:BIO. Valrith 04:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep based on IMDB entry. Encise 05:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Encise
 * Delete, seventh-listed actress on one film-festival indie entrant (itself barely notable). Get that lead part and come back to us. --Dhartung | Talk 05:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The cast listing is purely alphabetical, so it seems impossible to determine how big the part is, but, as you say, the film itself is of pretty marginal notability. Fan-1967 14:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete IMDb entry does not make somebody worthy of encyclopaediuc attention per se. SM247 My Talk  06:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete one minor role is not enough to pass acting bio guidelines. - Mgm|(talk) 09:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This person is non-notable. --RMHED 12:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * KeepComment: It was my understanding that the cast links were part of the article stub. (I apologize if that’s not the case. I just thought Wikipedia wouldn’t want “dead links” if they could help it.)  I also think there is a misunderstanding as to what the film is or who plays what.  When the stub was created random people from the film were listed in alphabetical order.  The film is new, but I also thought Wikipedia prided itself on keeping up to the moment and being ever-changing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.104.214 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 16 September 2006
 * KeepAnother Comment: I have in fact seen this film, and can say that this person is in fact a lead role.  I am disappointed by people's inability to correctly analyze article information before making snap judgment posts.  It saddens me that people jump to the worst before actually reviewing the true information.  This article and its information deals with independent film/a Canadian film maker/and film history.  If in fact independent film/film festival films, or film history, does no interest you - or you don't know a geat deal about it, I wonder if perhaps you should refrain from posting.  Just because information does not fit into what you personally are interested in, or does not show up on YOUR radar, does not in fact mean it should be "chucked out". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.104.214 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 17 September 2006
 * Keep. The article has been expanded from its previous version. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not yet meet WP:BIO. BlueValour 21:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.