Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Jashinski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Katherine Jashinski

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Possible WP:1E. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Jashinski is widely discussed in reliable sources regarding the current state of conscientious objector laws. Here are some examples, more than enough to establish notability:
 * Interview in Objector Journal from 2006
 * Discussion in scholarly journal Peace and Change from 2013
 * Discussion in Rules of Disengagement, a monograph published in 2013 by NYU Press
 * There are more, but these are the ones that are visible without subscription or a copy of the book. Try the GScholar search above to see what I mean. In any case, these sources are spread over seven years and there are other even more recent ones. They're enough both to meet the GNG and to refute any claim that this is a 1E issue. Central and Adams (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Appears to have coverage in RS. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY if and only if the sources found are added to the current stub. Bearian (talk) 15:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have added the sources to relevant points but I have not expanded the article. --StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.