Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine L. Adams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  OxonAlex    - talk  08:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Katherine L. Adams

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not independently notable outside of her company, lack WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:12, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete: I did some research but had a hard time finding references outside of directory-style information. I don't think she's independently notable, despite having such a prestigious position. Cosmic Sans (talk) 18:22, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I think there is enough to do a rough biographical sketch that would be supported by WP:GNG. I can't see . I have no idea why the Columbia and NYU templates are in her article though.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per TonyTheTiger. Bookscale (talk) 12:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have edited the article, moving career info from the "lede" to a career section, and making it chronological from earliest to latest, rather than the opposite. I have also added several sources, and I believe that she meets WP:GNG. The sources that are independent are: Corporate Counsel Business Journal, Law360, Law.com, The Global Legal Post, and Hello!. Verification of some biographical details comes from a non-independent source, the University of Chicago Law School news, but that is surely reliable for when she graduated from there, and where she had previously studied. I haven't yet found a source for her birth and parents, but then I haven't specifically searched for that yet either. (I should say that I'm sure there is more in the Law.com article, but only the first para is accessible without a subscription, so I have added only a couple of citations to that source.) (I do wonder how much WP:BEFORE the nominator has done for these corporate AfD nominations.) RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: passes WP:GNG. Thank you for the partial clean up Rebecca, and for the sleuthing. WP:BEFORE was needed. WP:ATD Lightburst (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.