Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Carley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination Withdrawn No oppositional delete !votes Non Admin Close  D u s t i SPEAK!! 17:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Kathleen Carley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Academic does not meet notability standards. Triathematician (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Dozens of non-trivial ghits, gscholar, LexisNexis entries. Madcoverboy (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Satisfies Notability (academics). Google search returns 231,000 hits. Besides, Kathleen is also the author of an important academic work- Ravichandar My coffee shop 13:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.   -- Madcoverboy (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   -- Madcoverboy (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Madcoverboy (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Article contains numerous claims of notbaility. Could nom please explain why he considers these invalid before I waste any time checking them myself? --Crusio (talk) 12:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I grouped this articles with others that I felt worthy of discussion for deletion (all created by the same person and as a group very self-referential). I read the notability guidelines, and I wasn't sure they fit. Given Ravichandar84's comments above, I'm happy to repeal my nomination in this particular case. Triathematician (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep lots of published papers, meets notability requirements. Nomination was likely done too quickly (albiet in good faith, I'm sure).--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.