Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen H. Hughes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Kathleen H. Hughes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Source searches are providing no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and virtually no coverage in said sources at all. North America1000 21:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * KEEP There's a move afoot to delete many of the lesser Latter-day Saint leadership, which doesn't bother me too much, but it would be a mistake to delete Hughes. Prior to her work for the Church, she was a significant leader in education. Perhaps that section of the article needs to be built up more, but it's not a matter of insufficient resources being available. Thmazing (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you provide just two independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage about the subject? This is what's needed to qualify notability. Said necessary sources do not appear to exist. North America1000 14:44, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment This article should not be deleted. If we can not find enough sources to justify a stand alone article we should merge it with the article on her husband.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG, there is no evidence the subject is noteworthy or of public interest and no sources to illustrate why she should be in an encyclopaedia. If there is a list of counselors in the Relief Society General Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints then her name should be recorded on it, but she shouldn't have a Wikipedia page to herself. Pupsbunch (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an inherently notable position, lack of substantive independent sources. Reywas92Talk 05:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.