Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Holtz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Kathleen Holtz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Holtz only claim to any notice is that she was extremely young when she became a lawyer and someone thought on making a TV show based on her. She does not pass any standard notability guidelines, we lack widespread indepth coverage, and it is all about one event.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:GNG and WP:BIO don't pass. Rinfoli   { *Di§cu$ with me"# }, 17:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. There's nothing worth mentioning about her except that she started law school at age 15, and passed the bar at age 18; and that one-liner is already at List of child prodigies. TJRC (talk) 20:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.