Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Hughes (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Nakon 05:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Kathleen Hughes (author)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails to establish notability of the subject. One novel (without a supporting Wikipedia article) is insufficient. Silly rabbit (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. D.M.N. (talk) 16:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 06:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral leaning towards Keep. Removed the link to an under construction page, but the novel has several reviews by important reviewers and was published by a major press (W. W. Norton) and went through multiple editions.  The article is only the most minor stub though.  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 15:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep If the reviews are added. DGG (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.