Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathmandu International Study Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Kathmandu International Study Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It's a G11 and probably honestly a G12, but I can't find the actual source. I could stub it, but then there's nothing left so bringing it here for discussion. ALso because the article has a long history and schools + PROD don't mix. This ~ 35 year old school has no coverage to indicate notability. There a listings, such as guides to international schools, but zero in depth coverage. As this is an international school, the lack of ability to search in the Nepalese script should not be a huge issue as there would be some coverage in international press. Star  Mississippi  18:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools,  and Nepal.  Star   Mississippi  18:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Star Mississippi, some of the sources (of copyvio) are in the article, such as . I wouldn't speedy though. It's an extremely old article, and its first revision is neither a G12 nor a clear G11. I can see why this article survived for so long though. Up until around 2 years ago, maybe even 1.5 years ago, it would have been kept per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The reason I think it was a G12 beyond the link in your first sentence was the "our" in This high standard of education we now want to pass on to others through our Education Quality Improvement Programmes (EQUIP) for KISC teachers and Nepali schools (emphasis mine). It's copy/pasted from somewhere, likely a 2010 version of the school's website. And yes, you're absolutely right. There's still some dissension on schools, which is why I generally think they need more than PROD. Thanks! Star   Mississippi  02:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete-- I could not find anything online. Since we are no longer presuming notability based on proof of existence, it's a delete. It is clear that people close to the school have edited it over the years. But the article still only contains primary sources. Most of it is promotional and copyvio. So, WP:TNT is reasonable either way. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note I have removed copyvios and possible copyvios. It is still in the history, for now, if someone wants to check the sources. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Per nom & above. DIVINE (talk) 06:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.