Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Doby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 10:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Kathryn Doby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The topic of the article is not notable enough. 14:13, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 23.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  14:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep her work as a choreographer seems to pass notability guidelines, even if her work as an actress/dancer was never fully notable. Even that may or may not apply to her stage apparences.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

 Recommend keeping the article as it provides unique background information not only for subject but also for Bob Fosse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.239.200 (talk) 01:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC) — 68.229.239.200 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * delete fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO. insufficient reliable sources to show depth of roles. LibStar (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 09:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.