Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Graf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ...with Tomwsulcer's Keep assertion not getting any opposes, and K.e.coffman striking the previous !vote and changing to Keep (non-admin closure) Lourdes  16:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Kathryn Graf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 01:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Her one role that might be close to notable, in Police Academy 5, is "Stewardess #1". While that might be a major role in some movies, considering she is not listed among the 15 or so listed cast in our article on that film, this seems to have been just as minor a role as the character name suggests. While many named characters have very small parts, it is a rare film indeed where an unnamed character is a major role. It does happen, but not here. Even at that, the one role would not be enough to show her as notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: What's the take on people with spots on Star Trek?  Maybe post to that wikiproject and see if she qualifies under their guidelines?  I'm actually leaning delete, but I'm not going to face the Wrath of Trekkers...  ;-)   Montanabw (talk) 16:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Tomwsulcer's sources need to be assessed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * As much I love Star Trek, a role as "Bajoran Woman" on DS9 does not meet the notability threshold. Delete.--Rpclod (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. An unnameed character described as "Stewardess 1" is never a notable role. It's the most trivial role someone can possibly have in a movie, besides being one of the extras in a crowd.  DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There are exceptions, "Baker's wife" is one of the lead roles in the film "Into the Woods", so it would be possible to make a film with "Stewardess 1" as the lead role, but that is not the case here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The only way that unnamed roles would confer notability would be if independent, reliable sources devote significant coverage to the actor playing the role. That is entirely lacking in this case. This actor is simply not notable. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Note 50 pageviews a day (unofficial) suggests a following. She wrote a screenplay which was reviewed in Variety magazine and also in Backstage magazine. Already we're at two in-depth sources, plus her acting work on Police Academy and ER puts her into the keep column, and here she's written another play which gets a write-up here. Meets the GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- does not meet WP:NACTOR; page views do not count towards notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep -- two reviews of Surviving David by Graf offered by editor Tomwsulcer add somewhat to the subject's notability. The play is autobiographical, so reviews include some bio data. She may be notable for that, as WP:NAUTHOR. Suggest keeping and improving the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.