Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Holloway (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 01:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Kathryn Holloway
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BIO, non-notable individual. Delete Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Unless the nominator cares to provide more specific reasoning about why this individual fails WP:BIO or is otherwise not notable, and what was wrong with the previous nomination, it would be appreciated as it is very much expected for every renomination. Until then, Holloway appears to be well-covered in this article about her political candidacy, was on a televised chat about policing efforts during the G20, and a biography and her move to the Ontario Liberal Party is here in this article. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 23:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make her notable. She's never been elected. At best she's an advocate. Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * All she needs is WP:GNG. She doesn't need to be a candidate to be notable. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 23:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Unfortunately she doesn't meet GNG. She is the executive director of a non-notable nonprofit. She has served on the executive council of the Green Party - not enough. The article lists only two items from independent reliable sources - the Toronto Star, which is about her candidacy in the 2007 election (routine election coverage specifically does NOT establish personal notability since all candidates get some coverage) and a dead-link "candidate information" listing from the Globe and Mail, presumably election boilerplate. The rest is press releases, blogs, and stuff from or about the Green Party. --MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - has survived 2 previous AFDs. Meets GNG. and WP:BIO.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Surviving AFD isn't notable. Me-123567-Me (talk) 15:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes infact it is. It is at the very least a strong indicator of notability that you seem to ignore.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't make it notable. It makes us foolish for having not deleted it before now. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.