Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn McCamant

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 23:31, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Kathryn McCamant
Article about a non-notable person, possibly a vanity article. I reccomend it be deleted. Foobaz &middot; &#10000;  06:07, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless someone provides notable evidence. Zzyzx11 20:39, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. not notable enough. &mdash;Brim 17:22, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, maybe merge this and Charles Durrett into an article about their book instead. I believe the book is notable, even if they may not be notable independent of the book. I'm not aware of any reason to keep separate articles on each of them. At the very least, they and their book deserve mention at "cohousing". -- Jmabel | Talk 21:48, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, I'm the one that posted this. I know them personally and asked them if they had any biographical information. My only rationale for attaching their bios was that I hought that it might be of use when I saw the CoHousing article with dead links to each of them as individuals. I did try to remove any gratuitous self serving info from their bios before posting, but if I'm violating posting rules, I'm happy to have them pulled. bren@lene.com

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.