Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Miles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Kathryn Miles

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I just declined a speedy on this one but I'm bringing it here as I am not convinced that Kathryn passes the notability test either as an author or as an academic. Nancy talk  18:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Deleteas copyvio of her web site, . Her book is just out, )from a minor but not vanity publisher) and may yet become notable, but at present worldcat shows only 9 holdings, and then a proper article can be written from scratch. DGG (talk) 08:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I missed the copyvio - well spotted! I have removed the cut-and-paste sections & the remainder makes sense on its own so I think we're OK to let this AFD run its course.  Nancy  talk  08:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete As shown by DGG, does not meet WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. --Crusio (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom and DGG. Drmies (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of reliable sources demonstrating that she passes WP:PROF. A Bark Magazine notable book is something, I suppose, but it's not really enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.