Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn haney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was I reviewed and accepted the speedy delete per CSD A7 -- Samir   धर्म  00:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Kathryn haney
WP:BIO claims notability (so no Speedy), but I don't think these achievements are sufficient for notability Rklawton 17:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and failure of WP:N. Mattisse 17:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Geogre's Law violation, and I didn't see any claim of importance at all.  She's feared 1) locally, 2) in the speech and debate circle, 3) of high schools.  That Venn diagram has a pretty small population.  Geogre 18:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, hey! I thought everyone except you was supposed to cite Geogre's law. A little, uh, egotistical, no? Fan-1967 18:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I came back to AfD after a two month absence, expecting a victory parade, and everyone's new, so I figured I needed to establish my bona fides as Archangel of Deletion again. :-) Geogre 20:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I can assure you that you have been repeatedly cited during your absence. Fan-1967 20:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. Geogre's law holds true. I wish her well, but having coached a team to second place in state debate finals just doesn't do it for me. Fan-1967 18:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (I think a speedy would have been appropriate. Agent 86 22:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. It is a borderline speedy delete, but delete nonetheless as this fails WP:BIO guidelines.  Yamaguchi先生 22:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy, no notable in the slightest. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.