Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Bartol

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedied by Longhair. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Kathy Bartol
non-notable high school band conductor, vanity Sdedeo 06:35, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

then why does the school have an entry? it is not famous in anywayAndrew D White 06:42, August 5, 2005 (UTC)


 * good question. There is a debate on wikipedia as to whether or not high schools should have entries without being otherwise "notable." But please don't go creating pages for all your high school teachers and friends -- there's no debate on that. Sdedeo 06:47, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

I am not I simply was noting one of the more famious people from my town I included more of her bio so you can see why I attempted to add this and thought it would be a good additionAndrew D White 06:51, August 5, 2005 (UTC)


 * Andrew, it's a nice impulse, but please read the criteria for including biographies of people first. Sdedeo 06:54, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

I could argue that most of the living people here do not fall in all these categories and that wouldnt make me any more right or wrong than the people who included them maby i should mave a call to delete 30% of the bios here because they are not famous in my part of the world. In defense of this articel though, I would say that she qualifies for: "Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events" Andrew D White 07:00, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I also added another reason for the "Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events" point (these can all be verfied throught the Newspaper"The Daily Item" which is published in Sunbury, PA Andrew D White 07:10, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Ok I am in a more civil mood now an I am open to discuessing this. It may have at first looked like a vanity page but that is due to how I write (I save a lot to ensure that hardware failrure at my end will not end up with the loss of hours of work which cannot be recovered. Andrew D White 07:23, August 5, 2005 (UTC) How mutch more notibalit do you want? I am not sure how many more of her notiable events I can publish without it being orrigional research like training some of the members of Breaking Benjamin.(not sure if that even made into a newspaper) Andrew D White 16:15, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless notability can be established. Eldereft 09:04, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Eldereft. --DrTorstenHenning 11:36, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy a high-school chorus conductor? Come on.  Note to author: I assume your intentions are good, but please, please pick more realistic article subjects. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  17:25, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I had a really good high school chorus director, too (we did Christmas programs with the Philadelphia Orchestra). But no, sorry. Get some perspective, Andrew: it just isn't encyclopedic. -- Mwanner 23:12, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I will agree to this Only if you all stop the character assiniation. I dont like it when people make personal attacks on me. Andrew D White 23:30, August 5, 2005 (UTC) (I am refering mostly to the last two comments)Andrew D White 23:55, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible. NN. --  Etacar11   01:06, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

I don't know that is qualifies for speedy deletion due to it having a remote plasuablity. "Only those articles where there is no remotely plausible assertion of notability should be considered for Wikipedia:Speedy deletion." Andrew D White 01:12, August 6, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete- as above. nn-bio applies, surely? Tonywalton 23:43, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.