Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Fray


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Kathy Fray
Non-notable author with 94 Google hits. Fails WP:BIO (I originally listed this article for speedy deletion, but inexplicably, someone didn't think it qualified under CSD G7). The article is also highly nonencyclopedic in its tone and reads more like a press release than a Wikipedia article, but since the subject is non-notable in the first place, it's not really worth anyone's time to improve it. Catamorphism 22:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable author, who coined the neologism "Uterosexual" whose AfD is being debated above. Fan1967 22:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the position of the nominator, who is well versed in things sexual and political. Brian G. Crawford 23:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Do NOT delete. Article wording has been amended. Wikipedia's purpose is to serve as a worldwide encyclopedia, including servicing users from Austalasia - and this is an author well known in Australasia.Triple-x 00:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable -- Astrokey44 |talk 01:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:N for books. Harr o 5 02:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability criteria.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.