Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Riordin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Kathy Riordin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails to meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO - reliable third party coverage is scant save for brief articles noting her original appointment and her subsequent dismissal from her post as commissioner. (NB - the article misspells her her name and editors searching for sources should search on "Riordan", with an 'a'.) JohnInDC (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per nom. I got much of the same information searching. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as none of this actually suggests any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough sources to argue notability. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom; regardless of only two sources, neither assert notability of any kind. I do not know if two sources make a subject notable, one concerns her resignation. Donnie Park (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. A local animal control board is not an office that gets a person over WP:NPOL, and none of the sourcing here suggests any reason why she could possibly be considered more notable than the norm for the purposes of WP:GNG — and no, the fact that she's the daughter of a former mayor of the city doesn't give her an inherited notability freebie, either. Bearcat (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.