Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Bulmer-Cooke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without. Discussion is closed without prejudice to a redirect to the article on the show. joe deckertalk 17:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Katie Bulmer-Cooke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable. The awards are minor without any evidence that they are regarded as important or significant, even within the profession. The references are entirely press releases or the equivalent.

By precedence here, appearing on the Apprentice is not notability. If one were to accept the premise of the show, it's proof of  just the opposite.  DGG ( talk ) 06:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    07:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I suppose if there's nothing to suggest moving elsewhere and better improvement as a separate article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to a list of other people who have appeared on the show, perhaps? (If there is one)  Montanabw (talk)  05:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.